From: Ken Garlington <garlingtonke@lfwc.lockheed.com>
Subject: Re: AJPO is still clueless about the reality of DoD Ada rejection
Date: 1996/03/18
Date: 1996-03-18T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <314D2FA6.24D4@lfwc.lockheed.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DoBuMy.41z@world.std.com
Gregory Aharonian wrote:
> Look, COTS and the Ada Mandate are incompatible, and where they aren't,
> Ada is still rejected anyways by DoD programmers.
I can't speak for the rest of the world, but I know of a few million lines of
F-22 Ada code that says otherwise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-15 0:00 AJPO is still clueless about the reality of DoD Ada rejection Gregory Aharonian
1996-03-18 0:00 ` Ken Garlington [this message]
1996-03-18 0:00 ` Byron B. Kauffman
1996-03-21 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-03-28 0:00 ` Peter Finney
1996-03-19 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-03-19 0:00 ` Is COTS the answer? Ted Dennison
1996-03-25 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-03-20 0:00 ` AJPO is still clueless about the reality of DoD Ada rejection David Emery
1996-03-20 0:00 ` David Emery
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox