From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,9ac62ca34a465706
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ac62ca34a465706
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Jerome Desquilbet <jDesquilbet@Rational.COM>
Subject: Re: on OO differnces between Ada95 and C++
Date: 1996/02/22
Message-ID: <312C5160.41C6@Rational.COM>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140634425
references: <4gbq7q$g08@qualcomm.com> <3129F185.41C6@Rational.COM>
 <dewar.824905880@schonberg>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: Rational Software Corporation, France
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; OSF1 V3.2 alpha)
Date: 1996-02-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:
> for Ada files, and GNAT does not require specs to be explicitly
> compiled

Even GNAT will perform a semantic analysis of Ada specs. Try to run a
C++ compiler against a .h file!

  Jerome.