From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,adb9b9207aecb4b3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: jonas.nygren@telia.com (jn) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: epoll Ada binding Date: 18 Oct 2004 22:03:04 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <311c6b78.0410182103.110885b7@posting.google.com> References: <311c6b78.0410181100.76f4e8ab@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.210.29.242 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1098162184 17648 127.0.0.1 (19 Oct 2004 05:03:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5430 Date: 2004-10-18T22:03:04-07:00 List-Id: Mark Lorenzen wrote in message news:... > jonas.nygren@telia.com (jn) writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for a Linux 'epoll' Ada binding. Any suggestions other > > than writing my own. > > > > /jonas > > I think you have to write your own. But do you really need epoll? It > is not POSIX compatable and only necessary when you have many (over > 10000) concurrent connections. > > - Mark Lorenzen The goal for my programming exercise is to be able to handle 10 - 100 000 concurrent connections effectively :). /jonas