From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.197.193 with SMTP id iw1mr3414010pbc.0.1335377235506;
        Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni97722pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: okellogg@users.sourceforge.net
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <31103380.3735.1335377235157.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbuo17>
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.33.214.84
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335377235 8038 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2012 18:07:15
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:07:15 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.33.214.84;
 posting-account=a23u_AkAAAB-Xz81hSqodYsmJRrMwioK
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-04-25T11:07:15-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 9:47:06 AM UTC+2, Martin wrote:
> Ok, we don't officially have Ada2012 yet but as no new features are going
> to be added to it, now seems like a good time to start thinking about the
> next revision.

It's been said before but I'll say it again:
A "continue" statement for quick jump to end of loop body.

I've seen this worked around as follows:

   loop
      if Some_Condition then
         goto Continue;
      end if;
      --  a couple 100 statements later ...
     <<Continue>> null;
   end loop;

-- Oliver