From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f443c7f5e2728025 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Received: by 10.68.235.4 with SMTP id ui4mr446578pbc.3.1333113999017; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Path: z9ni18776pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: austin.obyrne@hotmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Switching to a more recent compiler. Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 06:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <3061312.113.1333113998601.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbla14> References: <22596876.3.1333059140828.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbxo19> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.151.80.93 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1333113998 28857 127.0.0.1 (30 Mar 2012 13:26:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:26:38 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <22596876.3.1333059140828.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbxo19> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.151.80.93; posting-account=pmkN8QoAAAAtIhXRUfydb0SCISnwaeyg User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-03-30T06:26:38-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt On Thursday, March 29, 2012 11:12:20 PM UTC+1, austin...@hotmail.com wrote: > I am in my late seventies and I have spent a lot of time and effort promo= ting Ada through some cryptography I have invented that is a world first in= =93Theoretically Unbreakable=94 ciphers. >=20 > I have used a gnat311.p compiler for all of this that came with the textb= ook I used to teach myself Ada-95. >=20 > What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, =93will my= stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005 without som= e editing. >=20 > I want to be able to tell other users whether it does or not. >=20 > An obvious answer might be =93suck it and see=94 =96 I=92m a bit knackere= d however and I can=92t get around easily these days so if some kind person= who knows the answer straight off could tell me then I would be very grate= ful. >=20 > - adacrypt