From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,de85c452b42b049
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.143.143 with SMTP id v15mr305616bku.8.1333639348786;
        Thu, 05 Apr 2012 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 h15ni89221bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: tonyg <tonythegair@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Tasking, AWS and segmentation faults
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 08:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <30430138.605.1333639208754.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbbg2>
References: <12873826.360.1333555697441.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbhc14>
 <4f7caeb8$0$6640$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <jlie31$46p$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <11022851.605.1333622309882.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbug19>
 <4f7d7c1b$0$7620$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.58.145.51
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1333639289 21361 127.0.0.1 (5 Apr 2012 15:21:29
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:21:29 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <4f7d7c1b$0$7620$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=195.58.145.51;
 posting-account=28F2IwkAAACL1Z5nRC-dE7zuvWdbWC7P
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-04-05T08:20:08-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, 5 April 2012 12:03:55 UTC+1, Georg Bauhaus  wrote:
> On 05.04.12 12:38, tonyg wrote:
> > Thanks for your help guys its working lovely now and I know something new! 
> > 
> > What I did was (after reading the advice here) was I used a pointer and declared a 'new type' and then passed that pointer around.
> 
> For the sake of completeness, and without knowing what
> you are actually doing, so I could be quite wrong, you
> can still pass Pointer.all around (or rename this and
> pass it around as before).
> Large arrays are typically passed around by reference.
> Dereferencing keeps the impact of using pointers local,
> and easy to change again, just in case.

ooh ooh I forgot to dereference it! jeepers. Thanks for that you have just extended the life of my webserver beyond a fwe requests!