From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.12.220 with SMTP id 89mr39355068iom.20.1438168264673;
        Wed, 29 Jul 2015 04:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.104.147 with SMTP id a19mr565912qgf.2.1438168264550;
 Wed, 29 Jul 2015 04:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!pg9no4998284igb.0!news-out.google.com!4ni82568qgh.1!nntp.google.com!69no2598225qgl.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 04:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lyoaivxwr8.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=185.30.133.97;
 posting-account=hya6vwoAAADTA0O27Aq3u6Su3lQKpSMz
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.30.133.97
References: <iomd56$c1s$1@dont-email.me>
 <06f8a6f9-d219-4d40-b9ac-8518e93839bd@googlegroups.com>
 <87y4io63jy.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net>
 <7a29d3e9-d1bd-4f4a-b1a6-14d3e1a83a4d@googlegroups.com>
 <87mvz36fen.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net>
 <2215b44f-8a89-47c6-a4c4-52b74d2dac45@googlegroups.com>
 <f5b22bff-4191-4478-82ed-181e024c5bcd@googlegroups.com>
 <mnqs6l$mdm$2@dont-email.me>
 <9e492c82-868d-43d3-a18a-38274400e337@googlegroups.com>
 <c5e815ac-8987-44cf-b66c-c25403887e39@googlegroups.com>
 <40184feb-4053-4ac3-8eaa-c3bd9cd8a77c@googlegroups.com>
 <10272577-945f-4682-85bc-8ad47f3653ae@googlegroups.com>
 <87si8i81k2.fsf@atmarama.net>
 <e3023a92-0087-490c-8d51-daccf89a309d@googlegroups.com>
 <d17drnF4b0qU1@mid.individual.net> <lymvypjqdq.fsf@pushface.org>
 <1gsux33dqvjbp$.h0prf7p7g2vn.dlg@40tude.net> <lyegk1jk41.fsf@pushface.org>
 <mp6c9b$1ai$1@loke.gir.dk> <ly1tfszqlf.fsf@pushface.org>
 <mp8p9t$esn$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <lyoaivxwr8.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3013625e-e31d-4b74-96ff-cb39c3194ada@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: If not Ada, what else...
From: vincent.diemunsch@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 11:11:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27123
Date: 2015-07-29T04:11:04-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015 09:11:47 UTC+2, Simon Wright a =E9crit=A0:
> Was there some reason why we don't have - for example -
>=20
>    protected type P is
>       --  publicly visible subprograms
>    end P with private;
>=20
> and the private part of P declared in the private part of the package?
>=20
>    protected type P is
>       --  publicly visible subprograms
>    private
>       --  etc, as now
>    end P;

or in the private part :

for protected type P use record
   -- etc, as now
 end record;

then in the body exactly the same as what we have.

Vincent