From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,216cdb32fd9e9551,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion : Date: 1997/05/12 Message-ID: <3.0.32.19970512192732.00733858@mail.4dcomm.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 241212343 Sender: Ada programming language X-Sender: rleif@mail.4dcomm.com Comments: To: "John G. Volan" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: From: Bob (Robert) Leif, Ph.D. (RCL) to: John G. Volan, Prof. Dewar, et al. Please excuse, if I (RCL) messed up on the attribution I believe John G. Volan is the 0 and 2 '>' and Robert Dewar is the single '>' -------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 23:13:56 -0700 From: "John G. Volan" Subject: Re: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion > > JRe: Warning: Religious naming convention discussion : wrote: > > > But once again, I'd want the rule to be simple and minimalistic: Just > > always mark access types (and access objects) with "_Pointer". > > Bad suggestion. Access types are NOT pointers. SNIP until end ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- One trivial solution to the designation of a type as an access type, is to use "_ac". This is a readable short abbreviation. At least, I have already used it. This is another advantage of Ada syntax. I do not know of an equivalent two character abbreviation for pointer.