From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,4ef4bf3098ab117 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada compiler differences Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:02:01 +0100 Message-ID: <2tqme7F23qls6U1@uni-berlin.de> References: <2tnktdF1vq3q1U1@uni-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de lUYGYAyaPxs7aK4dKsIz2Qx5JBVcReS5+PdT9u1xlNdSx7Ni0= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5596 Date: 2004-10-21T22:02:01+01:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote: >>Annex A, paragraph 3 states: >> >> The implementation shall ensure that each language defined subprogram >> is reentrant in the sense that calls on the same subprogram perform as >> specified, so long as all parameters that could be passed by reference >> denote overlapping objects. > ^non- Oops! Thanks. -- Nick Roberts