From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8da181ade72859cf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Jano <notelacreas@porfavor.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Cygwin and gcc-ada 3.4.1 (was Re: timeouts)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:31:52 +0200
Message-ID: <2p8gqbFicla4U1@uni-berlin.de>
References: <sa4smakuhzq.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <q%SUc.27261$9Y6.4809@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <sa48ycbvn58.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <y27Vc.7035$3O3.483@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <sa4pt5jre7c.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <ST6Wc.30536$9Y6.10706@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <sa4hdqoev93.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de J4TXKpwarGQm45pUkSw2XArrL23WiYxDgRaltEN0P/7n7LWxE=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <sa4hdqoev93.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3079
Date: 2004-08-27T12:31:52+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have a doubt after all this talk about the convenience of migrating to 
3.4.1:

* I see the Mingw is in candidate status (may be good enough).

* If I'd choose to use the cygwin one, would the executables produced 
require the cygwin1.dll? (I suppose so, this is my doubt).

Would you say that is definitely preferable to use 3.4.1 over a patched 
3.15p?

Thanks in advance,

A. Mosteo.