From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d1a49d186e069b5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-28 12:10:55 PST
Path: 
 news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc03.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeff C," <nolongersafeto@userealemailsniff.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <b6Ddb.1863$QH3.333@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
 <pCFdb.454226$Oz4.259141@rwcrnsc54>
 <C_Fdb.2031$QH3.1956@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
Subject: Re: setjmp/longjmp?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <2nGdb.612655$Ho3.119351@sccrnsc03>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.31.4.164
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: sccrnsc03 1064776254 66.31.4.164 (Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:10:54 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:10:54 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:10:54 GMT
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:84
Date: 2003-09-28T19:10:54+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Looks like the easiest thing would be to just release it under the same
terms as libpng itself although
I don't see anthing about this license that would make it conflict with the
GMGPL.

Of course...the old standby...I am not a lawyer.

"chris" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:C_Fdb.2031$QH3.1956@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> Jeff C, wrote:
> >
> > A binding to libpng would be nice so don't let me stop you but have you
>  > looked
> > into whether http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~sjs/png_io/png_io.html will
work
> > for you.
>
> No I hadn't, thanks.  I think it'd be best just to go ahead and bind to
> libpng, since otherwise it probably won't ever get done.  I just hope it
> will get used.  If anyone wants a copy before it's finished let me know.
>
> I'm a wee bit shaky on the license of LibPNG, and am not sure what
> license to release it under.  I'd like to release it either under the
> MIT license or GMGPL but don't know if these are compatible with LibPNG.
>   It looks like a MIT style license.
>
>
>
> Chris
>