From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,56131a5c3acc678e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-03 08:08:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-atanamir.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: Dmitry A. Kazakov Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question about OO programming in Ada Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 17:11:46 +0100 Message-ID: <2n1ssv0idhfdttpmfupsb88v4a883sn225@4ax.com> References: <8urxb.19482$sb4.18182@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net> <1792884.HtYz4Yv8lY@linux1.krischik.com> <1070466281.168920@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-atanamir.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.116) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1070467669 66233570 212.79.194.116 ([77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3098 Date: 2003-12-03T17:11:46+01:00 List-Id: On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:44:40 -0500, Hyman Rosen wrote: >Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> Of course one could call Unchecked_Deallocation from Finalize > >I understand that Ada permits Finalize to be called multiple times >for an object, so calling Unchecked_Deallocation from Finalize sounds >like a recipe for disaster. Alas I my view construction / destruction issue should be completely reworked in Ada. There are too many problems with it now. -- Regards, Dmitry Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de