From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc4ac82d0abec4ff X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Jano Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Weird bug - Protected object - Gnat 3.15p win32 Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:48:36 +0200 Message-ID: <2lf1iaFboc4iU1@uni-berlin.de> References: <5d6fdb61.0407110729.657570af@posting.google.com> <87iscu4jxg.fsf@insalien.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de k6u4WpbmDF/9VJ0b0HdoSgFHtAmQMWdj72CUZeu66G0s7d9i0= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <87iscu4jxg.fsf@insalien.org> Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2150 Date: 2004-07-12T10:48:36+02:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Jano writes: > >>I've tried to get a small reproducer using new code, but failed, so >>there must be some other dependences for it to arise. Using the code >>from the project where I've detected it, it happens for every >>instance of the protected type. > > > I would be very interested in such a reproducer. I'll try to produce a minimal set of files needed to trigger it. >>Having been bitten hard at least twice by gnat bugs in 3.15p win, >>I'm thinking of making a bugs page for other people to be warned >>ahead. I'm already aware of the following: >> >>* The broken time packages. >>* The broken Select in Gnat.Sockets. >> >>If you're aware of such kind of bugs which are hard to detect and >>track down, please write about them so I can collect them for >>reference. I think it can spare useful time to newcomers. > > > There already exists such a central place; it is called the Debian bug > tracking system. If your bug is not specific to Windows, I encourage > you to submit it there: > > http://bugs.debian.org > > The following URL lists all bugs that are currently known in GNAT: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=gnat Very interesting. Sadly I assume the windows specific bugs aren't there. BTW, if you're familiar with linux maybe you can answer this: I've been unsuccesful trying to set a task stack size above 2 MB in linux. Gnat accepts the pragma but doesn't obey it, ulimits are removed, --X linker switches seem ignored too. I seem to remember from when I looked at it that it is some limitation in ld. Would such a thing, if true, qualify as a bug? Best regards, Alex.