From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d5f657e0da473b40
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Jano <notelacreas@porfavor.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: DBF/Network Application
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:56:04 +0200
Message-ID: <2kclkaFn218U1@uni-berlin.de>
References: <sa4r7ser82r.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <PUmAc.8535$Wr.4300@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <sa4d63xo2o1.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <yXFAc.5373$w07.2166@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <sa4u0x8kzo7.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au> <uk6y40zdi.fsf@obry.org>
 <2jnh1oF12nvieU1@uni-berlin.de> <cbpn2j$3si$1@news.eusc.inter.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 2L/hOZcZTe2pDFj1HkOdBgqBKmujO3QZrVMItuteGmJpdp3TI=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <cbpn2j$3si$1@news.eusc.inter.net>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1992
Date: 2004-06-29T09:56:04+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Michael Erdmann wrote:
> Jano wrote:
> 
>> Pascal Obry wrote:
>>
> 
>> I had some problems with embedded insertions in windows with and 
>> Access 2000 database, so the problem may be highly specific. Never 
>> digged into it. I was recommended to use directly the ODBC packages, 
>> which I'll try if I need some "databasing" in the future.
>>
>> The adbc packages in GNADE seemed particularly promising, but sadly 
>> last time I checked them they were linux only :/
> 
> The adbc package is not more maintained. The idea was quite nice in 
> having a common API combining all native and the odbc into one
> package, but ODBC does this any way. I would go for odbc.

The only drawback is that ADBC seemed very friendly, and ODBC seems to 
need quite some overwork for simple queries (?).