From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7684e927a2475d0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other
 licenses related questions...
References: <e7h852$7h0$1@online.de> <jccum3-trl.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <e7j2i7$4vl$1@online.de> <s8zmg2rdp4.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <449d2a28$0$11075$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <k7ejxer8x4.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <449d5c03$0$11074$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <rntq9299uobutv707i07gqi87oeba18e63@4ax.com> <e7k9j4$al8$3@online.de>
 <w1Ang.1115$NP4.742@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <6sbqsh6jv7.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <n1nu92praahokl5ev7ih75j9f2t09hugt8@4ax.com> <87Wng.5800$FQ1.910@attbi_s71>
 <ut8xnjn24z.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <aRfog.802589$084.191305@attbi_s22>
From: M E Leypold
 <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>
Date: 28 Jun 2006 00:49:38 +0200
Message-ID: <2k8xninri5.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.243.222
X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1151448204 88.72.243.222 (28 Jun 2006 00:43:24
 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.volia.net!news.germany.com!news.ispa.de!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5144
Date: 2006-06-28T00:49:38+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org> writes:

> M E Leypold wrote:
> > "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org> writes:
> >
> >> And GNAT is hardly the only low-cost compiler for those targets.
> > Exactly. There are other languages. All complainers now go away and
> > will leave the Ada community (which has as such no issues with highly
> > prices compilers) alone.
> 
> This being c.l.a, "compiler" means an Ada compiler. If I intend a
> compiler for another language, I state that explicitly.

Oops, sorry. This was really an unintended mixup with another
thread. Context overspill :-).

OK. Let me rephrase: There is exactly 1 low cost compiler, that from
RR sofware. AFAIS there is no Linux target (which in my context of the
discussion was always a given necessity). But one compiler hardly
justifies plural.

Or did I overlook other offers? I'm seriously intrested in the
information apart from the discussion in this thread which is already
a dead horse in my eyes. Let's stop flogging it. The compiler is not
an issue, there is FSF Gnat.

Regards -- Markus