From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e3949298ed3b36
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: "Nick Roberts" <nick.roberts@acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: High CPU in tasking
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:00:33 +0100
Message-ID: <2k0fllF160eotU1@uni-berlin.de>
References: <slrncdltli.nr.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de i2Tdbj4wZk+/+0Ac6p4LEAkmJccyNNP4W62AJoKpvkcqgjOO8=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1859
Date: 2004-06-24T18:00:33+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Lutz Donnerhacke" <lutz@iks-jena.de> wrote in message
news:slrncdltli.nr.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de...

> In order to stop others falling into the same mistake, I debugged
> several days.
> ...

I'm obviously only guessing at the details of your application, Lutz, but
gleaning what I can, I'm surprised that you seem to be talking about one
buffer. Do you not have a separate buffer for each reader (of a single
demultiplexed stream)? Also, what were the priorities of the tasks?

-- 
Nick Roberts