From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.66.196 with SMTP id h4mr1211454pat.22.1395829845418;
        Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.93.109 with SMTP id c100mr29535qge.21.1395829845326;
 Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!l13no11415469iga.0!news-out.google.com!bw18ni23786qab.1!nntp.google.com!w5no8800000qac.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1idv9jmp46s4s.a5imrixhtsn3.dlg@40tude.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2001:690:2200:9aa1:ed88:17d1:40e3:43e6;
 posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:690:2200:9aa1:ed88:17d1:40e3:43e6
References: <7f1c01c5-3563-4b94-9831-152dbbf2ecdc@googlegroups.com>
 <206rutb9pqak$.11a3dufqvmrm4.dlg@40tude.net> <lgu52g$hsc$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <1idv9jmp46s4s.a5imrixhtsn3.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2fe6c4c0-c66b-4857-a92e-b8978aa5f2f1@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Your wish list for Ada 202X
From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:30:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:18980
Date: 2014-03-26T03:30:44-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"only a very bad language could become very popular" (Kasakov)

You gotta love Kasakov's truisms!
FWIW I disagree that Ada 2012 is worse, I find a few 2012 things useful.
But I agree that Ada "development" should stop.
So my whish for Ada 202X is: no Ada 202X, please.
It's time for a new, good, unpopular language.