From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.228.76 with SMTP id o73mr1292469ith.32.1511278038300; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 07:27:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.20.173 with SMTP id d42mr730528ote.3.1511278038191; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 07:27:18 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!i6no2775401itb.0!news-out.google.com!x87ni1731ita.0!nntp.google.com!i6no2775396itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 07:27:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:c7:83c9:d658:192b:10e2:a8ea:9c9f; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83c9:d658:192b:10e2:a8ea:9c9f References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2fca0f38-833e-485d-9a38-febcdd507bb1@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: More reliable compilers (of some programming langauges) than GNAT From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:27:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 921849960 X-Received-Bytes: 2010 Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49032 Date: 2017-11-21T07:27:17-08:00 List-Id: Am Dienstag, 21. November 2017 16:07:47 UTC+1 schrieb Victor Porton: > Ada is good. > > But I have caught a few GNAT bugs while writing my software. It is too bad. > > Would you recommend me another language (not Ada) which has a quality free > compiler? compilers free of quality should be abundant for languages galore. > I need linking with C (like Ada Convention=>C), threads, containers library, > and if possible reliability. > > Maybe should I switch to C++? Is C++ compiler more reliable than GNAT? > > I also heard of D and Swift. Huh? > > Java? > > Or (oh, oh, oh) plain C? > > -- > Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org