From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7ceb00d83425e3a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "jhc0033@gmail.com" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: rant (Re: Ada featured in Doctor Dobb's Journal ) Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <2f8190bc-5362-4182-a40b-7650398670a7@l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com> References: <31a97103-1cbb-47b5-a93c-2a29c206556f@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <0d254195-50cb-4bad-b776-8d5c2ab09b6c@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <878wy9uyg9.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87zlqptajv.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <7f3435c6-bacb-4e02-a1de-2e73a417ba6c@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <87r6c0sei2.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.7.227.219 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1211070502 11338 127.0.0.1 (18 May 2008 00:28:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 00:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: l17g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.7.227.219; posting-account=ZDEUcwoAAAAfEl68GET6fODebgE-CIe2 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:185 Date: 2008-05-17T17:28:21-07:00 List-Id: On May 17, 4:21 pm, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > jhc0033 writes: > >> But that doesn't make C++ suitable for those either. I think he > >> rather had scripting languages like Perl in mind. > > > I don't think that makes sense in his context and time. The whole > > comparison was C++ vs Ada. > > No, you are wrong. The presentation contains several comparisons of > Ada with several other languages besides C++ (including COBOL, > Fortran, Pascal, Eiffel and C). ... very much in passing. Almost all of the presentation is about Ada vs C++. Anyway, it doesn't matter what better alternatives to Ada he had in mind for R&D.