From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.101.82.137 with SMTP id y9mr9013273pgp.24.1505213305425; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:48:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.36.122.208 with SMTP id a199mr738841itc.12.1505213305385; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!o200no270278itg.0!news-out.google.com!c139ni331itb.0!nntp.google.com!127no269795itw.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:48:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.71.175.207; posting-account=uulyKwoAAAA86DO0ODu--rZtbje8Sytn NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.71.175.207 References: <915874b5-52c0-4aa8-9023-82fddedb816f@googlegroups.com> <67345f73-530c-400b-9eb4-63eeb440154c@googlegroups.com> <9a6338d9-83be-4e45-b8b7-edc56e33537f@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2deb28e2-f7e8-4461-b8b8-c2c6cf2784aa@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Community Input for the Maintenance and Revision of the Ada Programming Language From: Egil H H Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:48:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 1551585530 X-Received-Bytes: 2306 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48047 Date: 2017-09-12T03:48:25-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 12:22:12 PM UTC+2, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > > Yes, but they would be different. A more close example would be: > > type Bounded_String (Bound : Natural := Max) is record > Length : Natural := 0; > Text : String (1..Bound); > end record; > Well, I don't have unlimited memory, so allocating Natural'Last number of Characters for all my strings is not an option for me, but I guess YMMV. (Sure, you can use a subtype other than Natural, but how do you choose an upper bound that is both reasonably large to fit most needs, yet reasonably small to limit memory usage?)