From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d60e0492375aa57a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-31 06:22:08 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: Mark.Doherty@uk.thalesgroup.com (Mark Doherty)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages??
Date: 31 Jul 2002 06:22:07 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <2d87db3f.0207310522.7236ea92@posting.google.com>
References: <DtD19.636$C8.2739@nnrp1.uunet.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.173.4.13
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1028121728 20302 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2002 13:22:08
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Jul 2002 13:22:08 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27521
Date: 2002-07-31T13:22:08+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> 
> Does this mean that if A.B1.C1 is private, it can only be withed by the
> bodies of A.B1 and other descendants of A.B1, and specs of private packages
> of descendants of A.B1?

Yes

> 
> If this is the case, how could I structure things to give the desired
> effect?

A private child is never visible outside the tree routed at its
parent. And within that tree it is not visable to the specifications
of public siblings!

Try looking in 'programming in ada95 2nd edition' by john barnes page
247. it has a nice diagram.


Mark