From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3b637950a34ec2d6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-08 03:10:43 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: Mark.Doherty@uk.thalesgroup.com (Mark Doherty) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Discriminated record question Date: 8 May 2002 03:10:43 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <2d87db3f.0205080210.34726bf3@posting.google.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.128.85.8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1020852643 7264 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2002 10:10:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 May 2002 10:10:43 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23713 Date: 2002-05-08T10:10:43+00:00 List-Id: > I presume, Storage_Error is raised, not Constraint_Error as you claim. It raises a Constraint_Error, albeit the debugger reports an 'Overflow_Error' first! The compiler would have been more helpful if a Storage_Error was raised. Does the compiler have the freedom to raise it as a Constraint_Error? Mark Doherty