From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c92999d3d36edb6c
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Marco <prenom_nomus@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: MinGW Ada compiler licence question targeting commercial
	applications
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <2c17a2c9-30ab-4e23-80f8-13ed131bd68f@x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <b437de36-b241-414e-9a4f-903eba06deb9@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
	<dc7e34a8-90a5-46a9-b780-7e3b7ba2c74a@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
	<e84d1b37-0a2d-4c89-b6b9-1ccdfac0f827@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
	<h1p2t5$rau$1@munin.nbi.dk> <h1qdo6$pui$1@ikarus.fw.belnet.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.244.32.26
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1246024885 11225 127.0.0.1 (26 Jun 2009 14:01:25
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:01:25 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.244.32.26;
	posting-account=WITAxQkAAAAHjnLda9Lofpqp8mERTWL4
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.0.11)
	Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6641
Date: 2009-06-26T07:01:24-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Jun 23, 4:19=A0am, d...@heli.cs.kuleuven.be (Dirk Craeynest) wrote:
> Yannick Duch=EAne:
>
> >> But I do not find about Ada 2005 in the listing
> Randy Brukardt:
> > The current version does not do Ada 2007.
> > (RRS uses the year the standard was approved as the name.)
>
> To all comp.lang.ada readers: please note that the internationally
> accepted recommendation to refer to the latest Ada language definition
> is to use the informal name "Ada 2005".
>

I agree since Ada 2007 is wrong - technically should be "Ada 95+"
since these are the published standards:
ISO/IEC 8652:1995
Information technology -- Programming languages -- Ada	90.93	JTC 1/SC
22
44ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Amd 1:2007  60.60	JTC 1/SC 22
45ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Cor 1:2001  60.60	JTC 1/SC 22

ISO seems to be a confusing mess !