From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a59c0afeb6808e51 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-04 07:58:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!colt.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!207.115.63.138!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr12.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Pat Rogers" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1f358d66.0208302358.6f1c6a39@posting.google.com> <87y9an5tt2.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <1f358d66.0209020705.6769d948@posting.google.com> <0DMc9.5002$YN.1223639060@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com> <_V0d9.120646$_91.183808@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> Subject: Re: Howto debug seg-faulting Ada 95 code? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <2bpd9.1100$x42.302857356@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.182.164 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr12.news.prodigy.com 1031151422 ST000 208.191.182.164 (Wed, 04 Sep 2002 10:57:02 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 10:57:02 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: OP]QRACE[BWMQ_H]]ZN@_TDAYZOZ@GXOXB]T]_MIJQR@EPIB_VUKAH_[MTX\IS[K[NGYJJFNOFZR_G[BUNTAOQLFE^TEHRPI]PZZRP_BMDSFQFL_]CBHXRWCMDCUZAZN@D_AKMNLEI]MWHCSXL^]NNC__CZFGSGHYYXWPFG@SCAVA]\FT\@B\RDGENSUQS^M Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 14:57:02 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28733 Date: 2002-09-04T14:57:02+00:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey Creem" wrote in message news:_V0d9.120646$_91.183808@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net... > > "Pat Rogers" wrote in message > news:asSc9.5091$Ss7.1261527110@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com... > The compiler I have seen which put package level variables "not on the > stack" are > > VADS -> 68K vxWorks > VADS -> MIPS vxWorks > VADS -> PowerPC vxWorks > Apex -> Solaris > GNAT -> Solaris > GNAT -> win32/linux Humm (to continue that phrase:), sounds like I need to check some things.