From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.26.67 with SMTP id a64mr2663008ioa.16.1518808285351;
        Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:11:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.157.112.141 with SMTP id l13mr255126otj.1.1518808285244;
 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feed.usenet.farm!feeder4.usenet.farm!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!o66no503993ita.0!news-out.google.com!m16ni1786itm.0!nntp.google.com!w142no500791ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:11:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5e5ce844-42a8-c2de-bf53-4acf67be7f53@bahnhof.se>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.99.9.146;
 posting-account=s89PEgoAAABHs2ETFyOrCeTQVQJAfzKq
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.99.9.146
References: <789f6417-5e6f-4d5f-8abb-80246f4f405a@googlegroups.com>
 <5e5ce844-42a8-c2de-bf53-4acf67be7f53@bahnhof.se>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2bf467d9-dbc1-46e9-981f-a092f82e7271@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT user-specified (via Raise_Exception) warning message size
 limit
From: marciant@earthlink.net
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:11:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50471
Date: 2018-02-16T11:11:24-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, February 16, 2018 at 1:59:17 PM UTC-5, Per Sandberg wrote:
> Well
>  From a quick glance i would expect the answer to be:
> 
> In package System.Parameters update the value of
> 	"Default_Exception_Msg_Max_Length"  to a new value.
> And recompile the run-times.
> 
> /P

Thanks.  I was hoping that there might be some "configuration" switch/pragma to do it.  However, if that ends up being the only way I guess that we would as for step by step from AdaCore or ask for a wavefront release.

(I'll have to read some more looking for a less "drastic" way before I ask to have the contact person ask Adacore.)

Vincent Marciante