From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c89a4b067758a6e1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_(Yannick_Duch=EAne)?=" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ? Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:10:07 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <2b943ca7-7b7e-4bfb-b2b5-bf2818e1e56e@t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> References: <4a448c5c-a4ed-446f-bb8b-67c5ba99927a@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <47bbfb5b$1@news.post.ch> <37b7e369-01c8-4adf-8d1e-c40fa7e51cea@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <9012d70c-8d61-4e2e-9eda-c12d48f1d9e1@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <47bc40e7$0$21890$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.207 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1203534607 12143 127.0.0.1 (20 Feb 2008 19:10:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: t66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.207; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.23 (Windows NT 5.1; U; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19917 Date: 2008-02-20T11:10:07-08:00 List-Id: Just to play the fool... a bit : there is a tiny mistake at [ARM 12.4-2/2] > formal_object_declaration ::= > defining_identifier_list : mode [null_exclusion] subtype_mark [:= default_expression]; > defining_identifier_list : mode access_definition [:= default_expression]; A "|" is missing :p