From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a850d20bfa8f3a85 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.204.129.212 with SMTP id p20mr1542255bks.6.1326282643427; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:50:43 -0800 (PST) Path: cj8ni82206bkb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o12g2000vbd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C++ on the Down Slope? Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:50:43 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <2a5a6067-6d68-4c6a-9d22-90a1d7b6a4c9@o12g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> References: <1kdog45.122iy7ikvhb9zN%csampson@inetworld.net> <1zpdlrlos3n8.vwyynkgg661c.dlg@40tude.net> <6066d344-1a62-4723-92ed-2b020fafa003@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 20.133.0.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1326282643 25061 127.0.0.1 (11 Jan 2012 11:50:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o12g2000vbd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=20.133.0.8; posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALERCFNK X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-01-11T03:50:43-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 11, 10:29=A0am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:50:14 -0800 (PST), Martin wrote: > > On Jan 11, 8:24 am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:08:12 -0800, Charles H. Sampson wrote: > >>> According to a recent email from LinkedIn, 488,992 people have "C++ > >>> skills" and this is an 8% decrease since last year. > > >> One probably should count C, C++, C#, D(?) together. > > > Never understood the inclusion of C# as a member of the 'C/C++' > > family...besides the "{" & "}" syntax, the semantics seems rather > > different... > > The crowd choosing C# now would likely chose C++ before. Both respond to > the same attitude to programming. Maybe...but there are those that moved from C->Java but you wouldn't include them and it have curly-brackets and seems more similar to C# than C++... C/C++/Objective-C - I can see why they get grouped. C/C++/C# - I just can't... -- Martin