From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.13.223.193 with SMTP id i184mr28320674ywe.33.1441064039163; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:33:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.49.225 with SMTP id x1mr387663obn.16.1441064039129; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!b6no432428qge.0!news-out.google.com!f6ni11193igi.0!nntp.google.com!uu8no1073531igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:33:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fd523d-03ac-4500-94be-f6220d9d16e8@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=149.32.224.36; posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.32.224.36 References: <32c623ac-817e-46fc-bb13-c77b47a506a7@googlegroups.com> <0e9794c2-8702-42bd-96db-978d87a97bf2@googlegroups.com> <87fd523d-03ac-4500-94be-f6220d9d16e8@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2a24ceeb-2627-4839-8255-2cfc05c6c6dc@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: bug in gnatgpl 2015? From: Anh Vo Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:33:59 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27657 Date: 2015-08-31T16:33:58-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 8:55:00 AM UTC-7, Anh Vo wrote: > On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 3:51:20 AM UTC-7, Peter Chapin wrote: > > In article <0e9794c2-8702-42bd-96db-978d87a97bf2@googlegroups.com>, > > leo.brewin@internode.on.net says... > > > >> I think the code in my example is legal so the compiler shouldn't > >> crash. > > > > It doesn't matter if the code is legal or not. The compiler should never > > crash. > > A bug report should be in order. By the way, it compiles fine under GNAT-7.2.1.