From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx28.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Shark8 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/36.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: F-22 ADA Programming References: <220f97ab-9aa2-4961-b140-2b271c3ab99a@googlegroups.com> <99759c3f-a35f-4745-a8fd-2fb6ab6fb1aa@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <2Vx7w.37867$cm5.17248@fx28.iad> X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 23:43:58 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 16:43:58 -0700 X-Received-Bytes: 2558 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3618918019 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23088 Date: 2014-11-08T16:43:58-07:00 List-Id: On 07-Nov-14 21:45, Randy Brukardt wrote: > "Jeffrey Carter" wrote in message > news:m2p0g5$4d0$1@dont-email.me... > ... >> Denying one's own comfort or convenience for the greater good is generally >> the >> essence of ethical problems. As such, rather than use an error- and >> security-vulnerability-filled browser, you should deny yourself the >> functionality while you write a better browser in Ada and give it away. > > FYI,, I seriously considered doing that years ago. I built my own mail and > web servers in Ada for this reason, and browsers were the next frontier. The > effort of a passable rendering engine stopped me (I wasn't going to support > Javascript or plugins of any kinds, as they were precisely what I wanted to > avoid in the first place, so the effort there was irrelevant). > > Randy. Ah, that's rather disappointing -- I should think a solid browser would be excellent, as for JavaScript I understand not wanting to write an engine for /that/... (I'd actually like to write a Flash-Player, but I keep running into little gotchas in the spec and getting discouraged) but I think that an Ada-based/Ada-like scripting language would be an excellent thing (esp. if it was type-/source-compatible w/ the backend [true] Ada) and provided facilities for DSA, modules, versioning on modules, and consistency-checks.