From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b7d3a51d0d8b6ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Extending discriminant types References: <20081115101632.5f98c596@cube.tz.axivion.com> <20081122011825.5354d1c1@cube.tz.axivion.com> <4928ecad$0$32681$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <648Wk.39330$_Y1.32087@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <492a7d07$0$30236$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> <8e021577-260a-44e1-b765-4d81f6ba89df@33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <492be08b$0$32676$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <0xZWk.396391$TT4.276049@attbi_s22> <71304b75-71bc-4691-b511-69882bdc0fc3@a12g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <492c77a1$0$31347$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <2ebc6a98-ebd9-4bfb-b69a-c313e9a9090a@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <2ebc6a98-ebd9-4bfb-b69a-c313e9a9090a@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <2T1Xk.451865$yE1.273979@attbi_s21> NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.16.158.68 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s21 1227663934 173.16.158.68 (Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:45:34 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:45:34 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:45:34 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2791 Date: 2008-11-26T01:45:34+00:00 List-Id: Adam Beneschan wrote: > > It definitely is. See 12.3(11); when a generic declaration and body > are compiled, the legality rules are enforced. I won't go into which > Legality Rules apply to this specific example, but it's enough to say > that since N (a generic formal discrete type) is not an integer type, > you can't use a universal_integer where the expected type is N. This still exists in GNAT Pro 6.1.1, so I've reported it. -- Jeff Carter "C's solution to this [variable-sized array parameters] has real problems, and people who are complaining about safety definitely have a point." Dennis Ritchie 25