From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,98aa5ed4e3de7a01,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-07 19:13:38 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!J64.STRATCOM.AF.MIL!BennettC Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Encoding: 28 TEXT X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 Message-ID: <2EE64BFC@SMTPGATE2.STRATCOM.AF.MIL> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 1994 16:02:00 PST Sender: Ada programming language From: "Bennett, Chip (KTR) ~U" Subject: Code reuse versus "cheating" (formerly: Using procedures) Date: 1994-12-07T16:02:00-08:00 List-Id: Bob Wells #402 writes: > "Bennett, Chip (KTR) ~U" writes ... > > > But this brings up a bigger point that is the real reason I bother to post > > this. I want to promote Ada, but I question whether doing a students > > homework is going too far. Comments? > > G'day, > I thought we decided on a previous thread that this wasn't actually "cheating" > but actually a good example of code reuse! > Bob W. (-: Missed the previous thread, sorry. I suppose in the old "punch card" days at school, when someone ran your deck through a duplicator, that would be considered "code reuse". 8-) ***************************************************************** * Chip Bennett, GDE Systems Inc | BennettC@j64.stratcom.af.mil * * USSTRATCOM/J64213 | Voice (402)294-7360 * * 901 SAC Blvd, Suite 2B24 | FAX (402)294-7912 * * Offutt AFB, NE 68113-6600 | Proud member of Team Ada * * Opinions expressed here are my own _so_, TTFWTW * *****************************************************************