From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!ucbvax!dog.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!cod!sampson@cod.nosc.mil
From: sampson@cod.nosc.mil (Charles H. Sampson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Implementing an Entire System
Message-ID: <2961@cod.NOSC.MIL>
Date: 1 Apr 91 19:21:43 GMT
Sender: sampson@cod.NOSC.MIL
Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


     Does anyone have any experience with implementing an entire system in
Ada?  By this I mean using Ada to write the system's executive, then writing
the non-executive (user, task state, etc.) part in Ada to get its executive
services from that executive rather than from the executive supplied as part
of the Ada compiling system.  I need to know lessons learned.  Citations are
acceptable.

     I know this is quite close to an Ada heresy, but it's a very real is-
sue on a project I'm working on, for a variety of technical reasons.

     I read this news group regularly, but email should probably be used
unless the response is of general interest.

                                Charlie