From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ncsu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!mcnc!ncsu!mauney
From: mauney@ncsu.UUCP (Jon Mauney)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada,net.jokes
Subject: Re: Intel Conquers Ada using 80x86
Message-ID: <2959@ncsu.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 13:44:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: ncsu.2959
Posted: Wed Oct 23 13:44:30 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Oct-85 04:27:45 EDT
References: <378@wlbr.UUCP>
Organization: N.C. State University, Raleigh
Keywords: Ada Intel Humor
Xref: watmath net.lang.ada:439 net.jokes:14611
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> 	... "All of this leads one to believe that the 8086 architecture
> 	and its software compatible follow on products (the  80186 and 80286)
> 	are the only microprocessors that can truly be called "ADA Machines"."

Of course, for those on the net who think that Ada is a broken language,
such a statement might seem entirely justified.
-- 
Jon Mauney,    mcnc!ncsu!mauney         North Carolina State University