From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,
	INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!husc6!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada waivers
Message-ID: <29561:Aug2903:33:1390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 29 Aug 90 03:33:13 GMT
References: <81816@aerospace.AERO.ORG> <275@aplcomm.JHUAPL.EDU>
Distribution: usa
Organization: IR
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <275@aplcomm.JHUAPL.EDU> dgg@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (David Gawron) writes:
> In article <81816@aerospace.AERO.ORG> byrne@arecibo.aero.org writes:
> >    Does anyone have any experience to share about getting an Ada waiver 
> >from the Air Force Systems Command.
> To say the least, posting to comp.lang.ada in an effort to solicit
> ideas on why Ada cannot be successfully applied to a software project
> is quite a novel approach.

Where would you expect the article to be? It's a quite reasonable topic
for this group. Do you think that all comp.lang.ada readers are Ada
fanatics? Do you think that, say, comp.lang.c isn't the appropriate
group for discussions of problems people have within the C community?

---Dan
``Ada isn't a religion. Ada is a disease.'' HJB