From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:26890 comp.software-eng:3188 comp.lang.ada:3450
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!amdcad!nucleus!tim
From: tim@nucleus.amd.com (Tim Olson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada speed vs. C...
Message-ID: <29483@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Date: 13 Mar 90 17:31:39 GMT
References: <8347@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Sender: news@amdcad.AMD.COM
Reply-To: tim@amd.com (Tim Olson)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Austin, Texas
Summary:
Expires:
Sender:
Followup-To:
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <8347@hubcap.clemson.edu> wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu (Bill Wolfe) writes:
| 
|    In response to recent requests for comparisons of the speed of
|    the code generated by Ada compilers vs. C compilers, the following
|    results were originally described at the Tri-Ada '88 conference
|    in Charleston, WV on October 26, 1988:
|  
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Among the C compilers chosen were those that produced the best times on 
| 16.77 Mhz 68020 based machines out of a list of published dhrystone results 
| for 300 compilers.  The TeleSoft TeleGen2 optimizing compiler was compared 
| against four other C compilers:
| 
|           Sun/Unix 3.2 C on a Sun 3/160
|           GreenHills C on ISI optimum V machine
|           Gnu C on a Sun 3/160
|           MASSCOMP C on RTU 3.1, NC-5700 machine
| 
| MASSCOMP had the best C compiler, our Ada compiler only beat it by a very
| small margin.

Dhrystone should not be used to compare the performance of Ada
compilers vs. C compilers.  It over-emphasizes string operations,
which ends up penalizing C with its implementation of null-terminated
strings. Many compiler/machine combinations spend ~30% of their time
in strcpy() when running this benchmark!

Most real programs don't use the string routines nearly as much as
Dhrystone, so the performance difference between Ada and C on this
benchmark doesn't reflect real-world results.  I'm not saying that Ada
is necessarily slower than C on non-string-intensive code, but the
performance of a number of different benchmarks should be compared to
ensure that you aren't seeing an anomaly or artifact of a particular
benchmark.


	-- Tim Olson
	Advanced Micro Devices
	(tim@amd.com)