From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:5003:: with SMTP id m3-v6mr4158747itb.52.1521745097550; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:58:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6217:: with SMTP id g23-v6mr132987otj.11.1521745097433; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feed.usenet.farm!feeder3.feed.usenet.farm!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!199-v6no1040837itl.0!news-out.google.com!j10-v6ni900ite.0!nntp.google.com!u184-v6no1040479ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:58:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <35fae0b6-53f7-49ac-a2b3-48c5d9fa823c@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.113.16.86; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.113.16.86 References: <7789c58e-ca36-44a2-8818-009eface4a3e@googlegroups.com> <926b83eb-6cce-417d-9c17-df6be2bc98d5@googlegroups.com> <2d1f392f-e747-42aa-8938-d6538d5b9934@googlegroups.com> <35fae0b6-53f7-49ac-a2b3-48c5d9fa823c@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2935f725-7bae-49bf-ac02-28f968d7f4cf@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada-Oriented GUI From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:58:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51143 Date: 2018-03-22T11:58:17-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 11:50:13 AM UTC-6, Dan'l Miller wrote: > > I had a nightmare one time where the ISO14889 C++ standards body started to utilize APL symbols to take the cryptosyntax to a whole new level. That's hilarious. If I were a member of the standards body, I would write a proposal for that and submit it [maybe on 01 Apr] to see if it would get any 'bites'... it could also require bringing back triglyphs!