From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ea12:: with SMTP id m18mr23720861ioc.35.1550630181733; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:36:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aca:afc3:: with SMTP id y186mr361499oie.0.1550630181650; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:36:21 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!y42no39192ita.0!news-out.google.com!d79ni48itc.0!nntp.google.com!y22no39151ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:36:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.109.61.2; posting-account=QF6XPQoAAABce2NyPxxDAaKdAkN6RgAf NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.109.61.2 References: <8b43f7fb-34e9-474e-a6b6-5e4e6f94f412@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2923bcd1-64fe-4dcc-b74b-c6a14932d12e@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Private extension of a synchronized interface From: Jere Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:36:21 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Bytes: 2179 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3131337991 Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55597 Date: 2019-02-19T18:36:21-08:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 6:04:26 AM UTC-5, Simon Wright wrote: > Simon Wright writes: > > > I think perhaps there is a bug in GNAT after all, and I apologise to > > all concerned for hasty remarks. > > Shall I report this? or will you, Jere? I can send something to Adacore if you like. I'll link the google groups page of this discussion in addition to the sample that fails. If you think reporting it to FSF's GCC bug website is better, I'd defer to you instead. I don't generally have good luck submitting things to them without messing something up. Last time I got fussed at. Which do you think is the better location: Adacore or FSF GCC?