From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,29f2c6a8b6f68055 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Distributed System Annex and cross-domain applications Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <2917cd56-d770-43b7-9629-a9fda2155e05@y31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> References: <87sjte2ig8.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <871v0wlt8n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.65.97.192 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1303508865 18310 127.0.0.1 (22 Apr 2011 21:47:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.65.97.192; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19963 Date: 2011-04-22T14:47:44-07:00 List-Id: On Apr 20, 7:36=A0pm, Florian Weimer wrote: > Applications which transfer data between different security domains. > An alternative view two (or more) otherwise separate systems > communicating with each other, where neither one trusts the other in > the sense that one system can break key security properties of the > other system. I'm afraid this is too vague. What properties of the middleware layer do you need? Or, better, how do you recognize that the middleware layer does *not* support the above expectations? -- Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com