From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.224.137.137 with SMTP id w9mr14544244qat.6.1376936139694;
 Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.95.233 with SMTP id dn9mr53955qeb.35.1376936139649; Mon,
 19 Aug 2013 11:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!f7no3097762qan.0!news-out.google.com!he10ni2655qab.0!nntp.google.com!fx3no3247364qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1308191900320.24091@debian>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.7.24.168;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.7.24.168
References: 
 <85li4gmhrt.fsf@stephe-leake.org><2wgl8bcmdsu0$.1rs1604fzwufv.dlg@40tude.net><85vc3jfias.fsf@stephe-leake.org><1gwg87tgm2bo7$.ae7440ka6kmc.dlg@40tude.net><85bo59g6h7.fsf@stephe-leake.org><ul3xotcxb4wh$.1rfdfqdzhndf.dlg@40tude.net><kttvbd$jp7$1@dont-email.me><bccmiwywovsc.1gr3p41feupbk$.dlg@40tude.net><5987935c-dbce-4602-b0e6-2bb85513588b@googlegroups.com><9oo34px7j5ko$.1j7bcnxwzgcxe.dlg@40tude.net><ef5ac77e-14b7-4328-8b7f-0db73020cee5@googlegroups.com><20130808111404.5fc6ce14@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se><1nfcrgjw8vkrb.1aukq12ys882l$.dlg@40tude.net><20130808133709.09dfef98@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se><ku0qti$6nr$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <20130809104904.6ca91de2@hactar.xn--rombobjrn-67a.se>
 <ku3ig5$9ml$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1308191900320.24091@debian>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <28b19646-ee67-4c3b-8c5e-25f44c44a8be@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: library/binding for sftp?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:15:39 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Original-Bytes: 2249
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183067
Date: 2013-08-19T11:15:39-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> One common error frequently found in homegrown protocols is encrypting 
> some stuff while leaving other sensitive information in the clear. E.g., 
> older versions of WinZip did support the encryption of files, while 
> including plain filenames in the archives. (I am not sure about recent 
> versions of WinZip.)

It still does. I encrypt the zip file again, then the file names are gone.