From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.157.33.49 with SMTP id i46mr14842410otb.30.1489400240148;
        Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.157.82.47 with SMTP id e47mr3070259oth.18.1489400240117;
 Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!u69no2807717ita.0!news-out.google.com!15ni13663itm.0!nntp.google.com!w124no2811352itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <oa5o97$cmp$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.251.73.50;
 posting-account=O3LyFwoAAACc1uh60ZcOUmAGdDmGsEcV
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.251.73.50
References: <oa31gh$1psp$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oa3cef$3gn$1@dont-email.me>
 <oa3ho4$mtg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <656ac88b-2d08-4f0f-a9ce-2dc72572b9ad@googlegroups.com>
 <oa5o97$cmp$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <28920eeb-46d3-4377-889b-a0601015eb44@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: ANN: Simple Components for Ada v4.20
From: slos <new.stephane.los@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:17:20 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28131
Date: 2017-03-13T03:17:19-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le lundi 13 mars 2017 10:20:40 UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
> On 13/03/2017 09:42, slos wrote:
>=20
> > Bj=C3=B6rn and I have a little problem with Simple Components on the Ra=
spberry Pi :
> > https://sourceforge.net/p/gnoga/mailman/message/35718432/
> >
> > Maybe you have an idea of what's wrong with it ?
> >
> > Or maybe you could direct us where we should look at ?
>=20
> The first check, when you build from sources, is the Atomic_Access=20
> scenario for your target. It is "Pragma-atomic" vs. "GCC-built-ins" vs.=
=20
> "GCC-long-offsets". On a 32-bit target that does not support pragma=20
> Atomic for 64-bit objects but nevertheless has Storage_Offset 64 bit=20
> long, it must be "GCC-long-offsets".
>=20
> If you don't use original project file, you must take the sources from=20
> the corresponding subdirectory of ./atomic-access.
>=20
> P.S. Sorry if that looks complicated. ARM should really have mandated=20
> pragma Atomic working for all scalar types, at least for all types=20
> declared in the package System and its children.
>=20
> --=20
> Regards,
> Dmitry A. Kazakov
> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

Thanks for your fast answer.

I've never bothered about this option "GCC-long-offsets" and, as it is the =
default, always used that on all platforms I have built Gnoga and Simple Co=
mponents.

The Raspberry Pi Model 1 B / B+ uses this chip :
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=3D/com.arm.doc.ddi0301h/inde=
x.html

Could you tell please if "GCC-long-offsets" is the right choice ?

Thanks again for your kind support.

BR,
St=C3=A9phane