From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL,
	INVALID_DATE,MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!seismo!caip!clyde!cbatt!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!psuvax1!burdvax!sdcrdcf!markb
From: markb@sdcrdcf.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ForTran-Ada ... (really function pointers)
Message-ID: <2877@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Jul-86 11:38:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: sdcrdcf.2877
Posted: Fri Jul 11 11:38:51 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Jul-86 22:48:18 EDT
References: <8129@cca.UUCP> <4700042@ada-uts> <1330@psivax.UUCP>
Reply-To: markb@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Mark Biggar)
Organization: System Development Corporation R&D, Santa Monica
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

For 95% of the cases (e.g., Intgrators, numerical analysis, graphics etc.)
Generics provide a reasonable replacement for function pointers.
The other 5% of the time (e.g., EMACS) the emuneration mapping seems
to provide a moderatly reasonable replacement.  I have still not seen an
example that is not covered by one of these two alternitives.

Mark Biggar
{allegra,burdvax,cbosgd,hplabs,ihnp4,akgua,sdcsvax}!sdcrdcf!markb