From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1647:: with SMTP id
 68-v6mr27774129iow.65.1535063776638;
        Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c68d:: with SMTP id
 w135-v6mr135815oif.4.1535063776482;
 Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder4.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g24-v6no3854648iti.0!news-out.google.com!c63-v6ni1531ith.0!nntp.google.com!w19-v6no3855619itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9403f091-7a72-467d-aa6e-19a61c2d1f3c@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <2bd66110-61e4-45c2-b731-7387b45b1e56@googlegroups.com>
 <d9d368bb-7747-413b-9912-654e10884075@googlegroups.com>
 <9403f091-7a72-467d-aa6e-19a61c2d1f3c@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2850d31a-7d01-4291-b56d-d655c5357841@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Which old version is best to use?  don't trust Adacore anymore
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 22:36:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:54235
Date: 2018-08-23T15:36:16-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, 23 August 2018 16:32:02 UTC+1, pat...@spellingbeewinnars.org  wrote:

> As a few side notes, the older GMGPL code looks kinda scary with many patches applied to GCC in order for it to work. 

If you think that's scary, wait until you get into GCC-land.