From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,fd4fc3d2b22df500
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.66.90.67 with SMTP id bu3mr12781645pab.45.1357876342139;
        Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 6ni100657pbd.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad)
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.arcor.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: 
 <283791595379105964.559253rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
Subject: Re: On Style: Any opinions on *not* capitalising the first letter of
 verbs in a procedure name ?
References: <wccvcbca02b.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: 05 Jan 2013 19:17:46 GMT
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 05 Jan 2013 20:17:46 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 0063eda9.newsspool3.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=RPS3]LR>?R]mG86`U=_nC_McF=Q^Z^V3X4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[04[3RTi>fNVPCY\c7>ejVXBeFJ_OYff0P8k\X?f6TGeU
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2013-01-05T20:17:46+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:

> As to whether your "reserve_Capacity" style is good or bad:
> It's not what everyone else does, so it's not a good idea.

As a programmer, I wish there was a "formal case" that
would draw attention to the fact that we are writing 
source code, which is neither prose nor bits, but is
readable if you are a programmer.