From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703c4f68db81387d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler <nntp-2005-03@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Teaching new tricks to an old dog (C++ -->Ada)
Followup-To: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:45:22 +0000
Message-ID: <2819323.pbOsY5JO1k@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <4229bad9$0$1019$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>
 <1110032222.447846.167060@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <ufyzahv6t.fsf@obry.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: individual.net WWVA/9kNkx6jlFVRE3XQ9gL0X3Oytm501A6c9EDtRte30H0d9j
X-Phone: +41 62 961 13 52
X-Mood: Another fscking Monday. What do you expect?
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8804
Date: 2005-03-07T11:45:22+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:

> "EventHelix.com" <eventhelix@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> - It will be hard to find developers for Ada
> 
> This is generally not true. It is true that there is less Ada
> developers than C++ but there is enough for the demand. I have never
> had problems finding Ada developers for my projects.

In fact, it is much harder to actually find an Ada _job_.


Vinzent.