From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9f3f1b40d2533ab8
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr6532509pbc.8.1337186361653;
        Wed, 16 May 2012 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni5825pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Rego, P." <pvrego@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Chicken or the egg. New targets & runtimes
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 09:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <28126498.2000.1337186361343.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynff7>
References: <9934369.1060.1337090738467.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yngr17>
 <23562031.232.1337111053220.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynz24>
 <31064186.285.1337113468939.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynbq3>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 201.7.145.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337186361 14243 127.0.0.1 (16 May 2012 16:39:21
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:39:21 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <31064186.285.1337113468939.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynbq3>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=201.7.145.1;
 posting-account=TRgI1QoAAABSsYi-ox3Pi6N-JEKKU0cu
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-05-16T09:39:21-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> We need to differentiate between AVR8 and AVR32.  I'm told that RTEMS size is in the hundreds of kB, so I'd guess their port is AVR32.
Don't know. In RTEMS documentation it's not specified. Anyway, they (people from RTEMS group) say that the AVR RTEMS porting is not complete, so several RTOS features are not present on it.

> Getting Ada with simple tasking on AVR8 would be nice just because of the large Arduino world, but I don't see any big reason to focus on AVR32.  Unless, of course, somebody has an AVR32 board and wants to do the work. :)
For me it's more interesting to use tasking on AVR8. Actually would be very good to use it on an Arduino Duemilanove (Atmega328P).