From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 19 Sep 93 09:58:37 GMT
From: agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!pipex!sunic!news.funet.fi!klaava!klaava!not-for-mail@u
cbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Patric M Stickler)
Subject: Re: Current state of Ada 9X compilers...?
Message-ID: <27hagd$7qc@klaava.Helsinki.FI>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993Sep18.163712.8933@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> blaak@csri.toronto.e
du (Raymond Blaak) writes:
>
>Ada 9X! Ada 9X! Ada 9X! The interest is off the scale.
>
>Cheers,
>Ray
>blaak@csri.toronto.edu
>
>P.S. The GNAT project may just be the best thing that has happened for Ada.

Ok, we have one strong vote of interest. Any others? ;-)

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  Patrick M. Stickler  OH2LUV, KC4YYY    The comments contained herein
  WSOY - Information Systems Division    do not necessarily reflect the
  Helsinki, FINLAND    (psti@wsoy.fi)    official views of my employer.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////