From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f23f789345652e5b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Users of the BON notation among Ada users ? Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:52:11 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <27a4df2c-5249-4013-ac0d-6cd9b09ad8ec@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com> References: <0e67d712-c126-478f-b1bc-d2d22ae66952@w1g2000prm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.145.133.17 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1231800731 22847 127.0.0.1 (12 Jan 2009 22:52:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.145.133.17; posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120121 Firefox/3.0.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4218 Date: 2009-01-12T14:52:11-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 12, 6:25=A0pm, Britt Snodgrass wrote: > I think UML has some good features, and is useful to support the > design of an integrated system, including hardware and ASIC aspects. > To better support Ada software, UML needs a *standard* Ada specific > "profile" to customise the terminology and extend the semantics (i.e. > an "AdaML" variant of UML along the lines of the "SysML" variant that > was developed to support whole system design). Back 2000-2002 I kept badgering the UML guys at Artisan and iLogix to try and create such a profile and I did get the impression the OMG were working on such a thing. But without being a paid-up member of the OMG, you can't get access to such draft or working groups. Artisan (Francis Thom - who's now no longer with them) published such a profile (still available for $25) but without there being an OMG stamp on the front only Artisan tools are likely to support it. I aware of other companies that have developed their own profiles to support both Ada95 and SPARK95 but I believe there are IP issues within these companies which prevent them from entering the public domain. Shame. Cheers -- Martin