From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!burdvax!eric
From: eric@burdvax.UUCP (Eric Marshall)
Newsgroups: net.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Exception handling question
Message-ID: <2729@burdvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Oct-86 13:01:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: burdvax.2729
Posted: Mon Oct  6 13:01:38 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 8-Oct-86 00:51:26 EDT
References: <10377@cca.UUCP>
Organization: System Development Corp., Paoli, PA
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


	I tried the same program on three validated compilers
we have in house and have included the results. For reasons I
will not discuss, I am unable to release the names of the compilers.
Here are the results:

	1) One compiler flagged the 'raise;' statement as an error,
	   and provided a reference to LRM paragraph 11.3.3. Changing
	   the statement to 'raise Bar;', the generated program printed
	   Got it.

	2) One program printed Missed it.

	3) One program aborted due to an unhandled exception.


	This program sounds like a good candidate for future ACVC's.
-- 


Eric Marshall
System Development Corporation, a Burroughs Company
P.O. Box 517
Paoli, PA. 19301
(215) 648-7223

USENET: sdcrdcf!burdvax!eric
        {sjuvax,ihnp4,akgua,cadre}psuvax1!burdvax!eric
ARPANET: PAYTON@BBNG