From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE,
	MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!nosc!cod!sampson
From: sampson@cod.NOSC.MIL (Charles H. Sampson)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Efficiency
Message-ID: <2725@cod.NOSC.MIL>
Date: 18 Jan 91 19:20:52 GMT
References: <1991Jan18.184803.19047@src.honeywell.com>
Reply-To: sampson@cod.nosc.mil.UUCP (Charles H. Sampson)
Distribution: usa
Organization: Computer Sciences Corporation
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


     As a quick example to counter the idea that Ada is inherently ineffi-
cient, at Tri-Ada '90 in December a paper was presented that claims that
Cray Ada (not yet finished, I think) is outperforming, on benchmarks, Cray
FORTRAN.

                                 Charlie