From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3ac0f9399164ca9f X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Qt Ada database support? Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:27:50 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <27002e8a-3e4f-4342-aa32-11b8dec8b122@y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.138.182.236 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244640470 13526 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2009 13:27:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y17g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.138.182.236; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042315 Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6415 Date: 2009-06-10T06:27:50-07:00 List-Id: On 10 Cze, 12:45, Stephen Leake wrote: > > You might be more lucky with this: > > >http://www.inspirel.com/soci-ada > > This is interesting. But it's based on a C++ library; I really don't > want more non-Ada code between me and my data. I have a bad news for you. The operating system, the database server and its native client library (including all possible layers for ODBC drivers) are non-Ada... Actually, the SOCI library omits the ODBC drivers, which are themselves non-trivial, on both server and client side. I never counted the volume, but I would not be surprised to see that SOCI implies much less of that non-Ada ugly thingy than ODBC, so you might be as well completely wrong with your judgements. Just think of it - you want to avoid non-Ada code you you get more of it. :-) -- Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com Database Access Library for Ada: www.inspirel.com/soci-ada